Page 2 of 3

Re: 5 Years of the Signalbox Signalling Discussion Forum

Unread postPosted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 5:20 pm
by robertworthing
Well done John and he's helpers. This forum has been very valuable for information and help. It's good to know that there are a lot of people with signalling interest too out there. DING DING...DING :)

Re: 5 Years of the Signalbox Signalling Discussion Forum

Unread postPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 8:01 pm
by Adrian the Rock
My thanks too!

Re: 5 Years of the Signalbox Signalling Discussion Forum

Unread postPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 11:40 pm
by LowdhamGPR
May I echo the sentiments above.

I'm not a massive contributor but I do find it a very Interesting read when I do pop in.

The depth of knowledge so many of you chaps possess is staggering.

Well done Mr Hinson, your efforts (and your helpers) are appreciated.

Re: 5 Years of the Signalbox Signalling Discussion Forum

Unread postPosted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 8:28 am
by Mike Hodgson
What he said.


As an enthusiast with no professional experience of signalling I find the forum a very useful source of information on a fascinating subject.

Re: 5 Years of the Signalbox Signalling Discussion Forum

Unread postPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 1:59 pm
by Pete2320
kbarber wrote:May I add my thanks to the list? I value this forum immensely and really enjoy the discussions that take place here.


As I can not think of a better way of putting it, hear, hear.

Pete

Re: 5 Years of the Signalbox Signalling Discussion Forum

Unread postPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 2:21 pm
by MRFS
I really must get on with organising a Forum Meet at some point - I've mentioned it several times to JH.

How about something in January to beat off the post 'Festival of the Merchants' blues? If there's sufficient take-up, I'll start a new thread.

I know of a few good pubs in that there London - probably around the KXStP area, but not exclusively so.

Re: 5 Years of the Signalbox Signalling Discussion Forum

Unread postPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 8:45 pm
by Stuart Johnson
Sounds like a good idea

Re: 5 Years of the Signalbox Signalling Discussion Forum

Unread postPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 9:56 pm
by StevieG
Stuart Johnson wrote:Sounds like a good idea
Yes !

Re: 5 Years of the Signalbox Signalling Discussion Forum

Unread postPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 9:29 am
by Peter Jordan
Pity this idea wasn't suggested earlier - we could have made it part of our signalling gala last month.

Peter Jordan

Re: 5 Years of the Signalbox Signalling Discussion Forum

Unread postPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 9:43 am
by kbarber
Excellent idea, hope I can avoid diary clashes.

Re: 5 Years of the Signalbox Signalling Discussion Forum

Unread postPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:23 pm
by JRB
So long as you avoid (or join on to) SRS & IRSE fixtures.

Re: 5 Years of the Signalbox Signalling Discussion Forum

Unread postPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 7:35 pm
by Chris Osment
Pity this idea wasn't suggested earlier - we could have made it part of our signalling gala last month.......


...and risk being mildly intoxicated whilst in charge of a signal-box ??? :lol:

Re: 5 Years of the Signalbox Signalling Discussion Forum

Unread postPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 11:39 pm
by MRFS
I shall get in contact with JH and start the ball rolling then, watch this space for a separate thread.....

Re: 5 Years of the Signalbox Signalling Discussion Forum

Unread postPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 9:45 am
by kbarber
Chris Osment wrote:
Pity this idea wasn't suggested earlier - we could have made it part of our signalling gala last month.......


...and risk being mildly intoxicated whilst in charge of a signal-box ???

Now that's a good idea. If the trains are virtual so will the form 1s be :lol: .

Re: 5 Years of the Signalbox Signalling Discussion Forum

Unread postPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:17 pm
by StevieG
kbarber wrote:
Chris Osment wrote:
Pity this idea wasn't suggested earlier - we could have made it part of our signalling gala last month.......


...and risk being mildly intoxicated whilst in charge of a signal-box ???

Now that's a good idea. If the trains are virtual so will the form 1s be :lol: .
"You are charged with the undermentioned imagined irregularity...."