Signals

THE SIGNAL BOX


Railway signalling discussion

Unusual use of cl.9 headcode

Current and future British signalling (UK except Northern Ireland)

Unusual use of cl.9 headcode

Unread postby Mike Stone » Wed May 31, 2017 9:30 am

A Freightliner has failed at Cropredy. Chiltern are using cl.9 for specials starting at Banbury or Leamington as a result.
Mike Stone
Mike Stone
Rest-day relief
Rest-day relief
 
Posts: 1137
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 2:50 pm

Re: Unusual use of cl.9 headcode

Unread postby Peter Gibbons » Wed May 31, 2017 2:39 pm

According to the Rule Book Module TS1 General Signalling Regulations, a Class 9 train is defined under Track Circuit Block, Absolute Block or Electric Token Block as follows:

Passenger (Class 373 or other passenger train if specially authorised) (Standard Bell Code 1-4)

or

Empty coaching stock (Class 373) (Standard Bell Code 1-4-1)
Peter G
User avatar
Peter Gibbons
Branch line box
Branch line box
 
Posts: 147
Joined: Fri Nov 9, 2007 1:07 pm
Location: Hassocks, West Sussex

Re: Unusual use of cl.9 headcode

Unread postby LAMPMAN » Wed May 31, 2017 5:15 pm

Class 9 Headcodes are used on a few routes West Coast Main LIne use class 9 and so does ATW on the Wales route for amended working
Windy up this Distant

LAMPMAN
User avatar
LAMPMAN
Crossing box
Crossing box
 
Posts: 88
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 2:36 am
Location: DOWN BRANCH DISTANT BIG HILL

Re: Unusual use of cl.9 headcode

Unread postby RobMorel » Wed May 31, 2017 6:33 pm

2018 will see all services bound from/to the Central London Thameslink Core (St Pancras Low Level - Blackfriars) described as class 9 also when in passenger use
User avatar
RobMorel
Crossing box
Crossing box
 
Posts: 72
Joined: Sat Jun 4, 2011 9:00 pm
Location: St Pancras

Re: Unusual use of cl.9 headcode

Unread postby Mike Hodgson » Wed May 31, 2017 9:03 pm

Mike Stone wrote:A Freightliner has failed at Cropredy. Chiltern are using cl.9 for specials starting at Banbury or Leamington as a result.


Do you know whether this is a purely temporary arrangement during the failure or a standing instruction?
User avatar
Mike Hodgson
Main line box
Main line box
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Fri Nov 9, 2007 5:30 pm
Location: N Herts

Re: Unusual use of cl.9 headcode

Unread postby collexions » Wed May 31, 2017 10:49 pm

RobMorel wrote:2018 will see all services bound from/to the Central London Thameslink Core (St Pancras Low Level - Blackfriars) described as class 9 also when in passenger use

Was about to post the very same, good shout.
collexions
Crossing box
Crossing box
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2014 10:48 am

Re: Unusual use of cl.9 headcode

Unread postby Mike Stone » Thu Jun 1, 2017 9:32 am

I've never come across an ATW CL.9 - either planned or contingency.
;
East London trains are already Cl.9 - perhaps Thameslink ought to be 8 and freight classes 7 and 8 combined?
Mike Stone
Mike Stone
Rest-day relief
Rest-day relief
 
Posts: 1137
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 2:50 pm

Re: Unusual use of cl.9 headcode

Unread postby rower40 » Sat Jun 3, 2017 5:24 pm

The Network Rail Timetable Planning Rules define the usage of class 9 trains - there are regional variations.
Trains formed of class 373 stock feature highly, but only the Kent Rules refer to class 374. East London Line services are mentioned in the Planning Rules for the relevant regions/zones/territories/areas/whatever. Virgin Anglo-Scottish services via the West Midlands run as class 9 (in the London North Western rules), and the phrase "Other Passenger Services Where Specially Authorised" crops up in most of the Rules documents.

Interestingly, in London North Eastern, class 9 does not appear at all. The "White Rose" trains that used Eurostar stock from Kings Cross to York and Leeds a few years ago ran as 1X train descriptions, because there was a feature of Peterborough PSB's Train Describer which treated class 9 as Unfitted Freight, and (as I was told) caused the interlocking to hold many signals at red until the Eurostar train had cleared several block sections further along.
rower40
Crossing box
Crossing box
 
Posts: 72
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2012 9:59 am

Re: Unusual use of cl.9 headcode

Unread postby Mad Mac » Sat Jun 3, 2017 10:01 pm

Ah, Catch Point Restraint. Taken out of Motherwell SC many years ago.
Mad Mac
Rest-day relief
Rest-day relief
 
Posts: 641
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2007 11:47 pm

Re: Unusual use of cl.9 headcode

Unread postby JRB » Sat Jun 3, 2017 10:13 pm

Catch Point Restraint: yes we had to allow for those class 9 s on the WN/PE/CA TDs.
JRB
Double-manned box
Double-manned box
 
Posts: 3216
Joined: Sun Dec 9, 2007 10:12 pm
Location: GWR

Re: Unusual use of cl.9 headcode

Unread postby Alan Roberts » Sat Jul 15, 2017 5:49 am

JRB wrote:Catch Point Restraint: yes we had to allow for those class 9 s on the WN/PE/CA TDs.


We had some recently along the North Wales Coast for some of the Euston bound Virgin services running on a certain weekday and were described as 1-4 instead of the usual 4 on the block bell.
1R13 became 9R13
1R24 became 9R24
1A13 became 9A13
Oh no - Signal wire snapped again !!!

http://www.flickr.com/photos/alanroberts56
User avatar
Alan Roberts
Branch line box
Branch line box
 
Posts: 149
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2008 6:50 pm
Location: GLAN CONWY


Return to Signalling - current

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests