Railway signalling discussion

RAIB report: Barratt's Lane crossing , Attenborough 26/10/13

Discussion concerning level crossings

RAIB report: Barratt's Lane crossing , Attenborough 26/10/13

Unread postby John Webb » Fri Aug 22, 2014 3:32 pm

Published today:

At 14:48 hrs on Saturday 26 October 2013, a pedestrian was struck and fatally injured by a train on Barratt’s Lane No.2 footpath crossing, at Attenborough near Nottingham.

The train was travelling from Nottingham towards Birmingham. At the same time, a London to Nottingham train was slowly approaching the crossing from the other direction. It is likely that the pedestrian had concentrated her attention on the London train and did not notice the train approaching from the Nottingham direction.

Both trains were fitted with forward facing closed circuit television equipment and the recording from the London to Nottingham train showed that the pedestrian approached the crossing and waited at the gate for 17 seconds before opening it; she started to cross the line 9 seconds later (the train was stopped at a red signal for part of this time). It is most likely that, having seen the London train stopped at the signal, she waited until she had judged that the train was not moving before deciding to cross the line. The sighting distances in both directions were adequate.

Network Rail had assessed the risk at the crossing, in accordance with its standard procedures, and, because the risk rating was relatively high, discussed the options for reducing this risk at a meeting with the highway authority. The chosen option was to divert the footpath and close the crossing. This had not been implemented at the time of the accident as the route of the proposed diversion was obstructed by an equipment room. The room contained signalling equipment that did not become redundant until completion of the Nottingham station resignalling project at the end of August 2013. The equipment room was demolished and the footpath diverted after the accident.


As a consequence of this accident, RAIB has identified one learning point related to the design of gates at crossings of this type. It has made no recommendations.
John Webb
(Member, St Albans Signalbox Trust)
User avatar
John Webb
Main line box
Main line box
Posts: 1884
Joined: Tue Jul 8, 2008 1:22 pm
Location: St Albans, Herts

Re: RAIB report: Barratt's Lane crossing , Attenborough 26/1

Unread postby John Hinson » Fri Aug 22, 2014 3:46 pm

I'm not convinced this incident and its report have much do with signalling.

Locked for now . . .

User avatar
John Hinson
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 6980
Joined: Thu Nov 8, 2007 1:13 pm
Location: at my computer

Return to Level crossings

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest